

This one is kind of personal, but I am sure at least some of you who play this also play WoT. Over relating the game to other games and/or realism.(A veteran conscript squad is by far worth the work of keeping them alive) Playing soviets for exaple, I would think of and use my conscripts as a meatshield without ANY amount of unit preservation in mind. Using history (or how the campaign wants you to think) as too much of a reference.(For Example: These riflemen are almost dead, pinned down by a german Mg, and being shot out by another squad, so i would try to get them to move up and throw a frag at the Mg and call a retreat right before them being killed.) 9 times out of 10 it did not work and I lost a squad, but when it did work it was awesome!.) As far as capturing territories went, I claimed what was on my teams half and the control points, and let the enemies have their territory (which is bad as i now know!).Many of the issues i noticed in my self were: I noticed a few key tricks and also why I was failing before. After coming back to competative play I decided to try any and all possible ideas that came to mind (since my old stratagy obviously wasn't working!). Because of this I only recently got back into the multiplayer/competative scene, as I just kept comp stomping on automatch vs AI. I even checked the endgame stat screens and everything seemed to be fine. I then moved on to the next match expecting different results, yet they never came. It did not help that no one I was ever matched with pointed out that I was doing something wrong (and it wasn't uncommon for them to get angry at me without providing advice), so I assumed the other players were doing something cheap or were simply better players. Forces, but play the Germans as well) For the longest time, I just kept playing multiplayer matches and kept getting shutdown and defeated quite decisively and could not figure out why. (Note: I usually play the allies, both Soviets and U.S.
